« Thoughts on the Thanksgiving Parade "News" | Main | Car Troubles »

December 6, 2005

Dean Says US Won't Win In Iraq

Seemingly intent on destroying the Democrats from inside, Howard Dean is off running his mouth again. This time, he says that the US will not win in Iraq.

"I've seen this before in my life. This is the same situation we had in Vietnam. Everybody then kept saying, 'just another year, just stay the course, we'll have a victory.' Well, we didn't have a victory, and this policy cost the lives of an additional 25,000 troops because we were too stubborn to recognize what was happening."

Of course, this ignores some simple facts about Vietnam, as well. We WERE winning in Vietnam. Once we reached a point where US forces could be pulled out, because the South Vietnamese forces were capable of winning with only our financial help, we came home. Soon after, the Democrats in Congress removed the support for South Vietnam, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. They had so much political capital invested in the idea that we were losing that they had to take moves to ensure we lost.

That's where we are in Iraq. The left has so much political capital invested in the idea that Iraq is a failure that they cannot acknowledge the successes, and must ensure that the US does not succeed. They were wrong about our chances for success in Afghanistan. They were wrong about the number of bodybags needed there. They were wrong about the successful creations of a constitution and government. They were wrong about the timeline in the Iraq invasion. They were wrong about the death toll in the Iraq invasion. They were wrong about the timeline for the creation of a constitution in Iraq. They were wrong about the creation of a government in Iraq. They were wrong about whether the Iraqis could carry out a vote. They were wrong about the rebuilding of schools, hospitals, police stations, and communities. They were wrong about the rebuilding of the Iraqi Army. They're constantly wrong about the support in Iraq for the actions the US has taken.

If they have gone all this time, and spent all this political capital on the idea that we're losing a war we've already won, and then we go and succeed in the rebuilding process as well, somebody might just notice. That's why it is vitally important that the left, and the Democrats in particular, succeed in defeating the United States in time of war. They've invested their own success in their country's defeat. Sadly, the goals of the Democrats and the United States are at odds like never before in the history of our country.

Michael Reagan calls Dean's words treasonous. I agree, but if the government under George Bush won't prosecute treason in the cases of people who actually went to Iraq to serve as human shields at strategic targets, then I have no faith it will prosecute Dean. I don't even think Dean's speech SHOULD be prosecuted, mind you, but the chances are nil.

Dean is counting on Bush being weak in his response to this statement. That's because Bush has a history of weak responses. That doesn't make Dean right in any sense. He's not right factually, morally, ethically, or at all.

He's also counting on his supporters being too ignorant to know he's lying. On that, he's been proven correct many times.

Posted by Lockjaw at December 6, 2005 5:29 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.lockjawslair.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/284

Comments

Treasonous? Somewhere along the line the right in the US somehow got the idea it should claim ownership of patriotism and patent the US flag for itself. Kind of reminds me of the McCarthy era, except then the other guy was a commie and so he wasn’t really a fellow American, not really anyway. Now you just have a culture that looks like it’s ripping its own heart out looking for the beast within. Why? Is it something about American culture that requires it to define itself by its enemies rather than its merits? Does all this political soap boxing achieve anything besides mutual back slapping? What does it break down to nowadays? The 31% on the right Vs the 29% on the left with the 40% in the middle who don’t bother to vote at all? Cant be more than a couple of percentage points off either way, it seems pretty clear that if apathy could run for office it would be elected in a landslide.

Posted by: John at December 8, 2005 10:43 PM

Check out a funny site dedicated to the absurdity and satire nature of saying “It’s All George Bush’s Fault!"

http://www.itsallgeorgebushsfault.com

I hope that you don't think this is spam. I really do think that you'd appreciate a site like this since we share the same idealogy.

Regards,
Notta Libb

Posted by: Notta Libb at December 20, 2005 4:34 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?